Wikipedia:Peer review/Mouse (computing)/archive1
Appearance
I think this is fairly good, at least a Good Article. Comments? ffm yes? 14:18, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well, they won't pass it as a GA if it has cleanup tags or [citation needed] tags on it. Also some of the references are [1] this kind and would need to be converted to the <ref> kind. The "Accessories" section and the "Mice in gaming" section are unsourced and could be reduced to a sentence or two each without losing any valuable content. Recury 18:40, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 20:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)