Wikipedia:Peer review/Mooney Mooney Bridge/archive1

Mooney Mooney Bridge

I have recently completed this page to my own standards, but I wanted to know what others think of it. I have no plans for it to be FA or GA but any improvement would be fantastic. I am a bit unsure of the design section if anyone has any ideas for that section. Todd661 03:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it still needs more content. Check out San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge for ideas.--BirgitteSB 04:13, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

- I know it needs more content - especially things like traffic figures. But this is all there is available on the internet...although I haven't exhausted books yet. I start uni again next week so I will be able to look then. Todd661 07:28, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As a service to international Wikipedia readers, you might want to insert the word "Australia" somewhere (I'd suggest once in the infobox and once in the article). Other tips:
- Avoid WP:WEASEL words: "has been said" — said by whom?
- "have prompted debate" — debate amongst whom?
- Use Wikipedia:Citation templates to uniformly format all citations.
- Some financial data would be nice. How much did it cost to design, build and maintain? Who is financing it?
- The article really needs a section about the basic use of the bridge, between "Design" and "Incidents". How much traffic does it carry? What kind of traffic? What did it do to the local economy? How is it maintained? Right now, the article seems to suggest that the bridge was built to cause incidents only...
Good luck! --Plek 14:27, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR _t 20:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestions. Now to put them into practice. Todd661 03:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]