Wikipedia:Peer review/Montenegro/archive1
General peer review to see if it is ready for, or what needs improving to make it ready for, either 'good article' status or 'featured article' status. --CrnaGora 15:20, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
RJH
[edit]The article appears to be in fairly decent condition, but there are a few details needing work. Here's some comments of a general nature:
- More inline citations are needed in several sections. The Geography, Government and politics, Economy, and Miscellaneous sections have no citations at all, but most of those that do have citations are in need of more. That information had to have come from somewhere.
- The later part of the article has too many one-sentence paragraphs.
- I don't think the gallery is really appropriate for an encyclopedic article. None of the FA'd nation-state articles appear to include a gallery. My suggestion would be to move the appropriate images to the Commons and set up a gallery page there.
- The references are not set up in the standard citation format. I recommend using Wikipedia:Citation templates throughout.
I hope these were of some help. — RJH (talk) 22:12, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
GDallimore
[edit]I'm not an expert on international economics, but the economics section and the associated main article seem somewhat lacking in terms of the effect on the economy of the split from Serbia. I know it's early days yet, but how are the Montenegrins doing in managing their economy?
The reason I mention this side of things is that I've been following the development of Montenegro's intellectual property laws since their split from Serbia. Perhaps some of these sources could help beef up the relevant sections:
Hope it helps. Overall the article looks to be in great shape for some final tidying up. GDallimore (Talk) 10:02, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- One quick comment that Image:CG-Pobjeda.jpg needs a fair-use rationale. It should be pretty easy as it's arguably a very historically significant moment. (ESkog)(Talk) 17:24, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
