There are a number of suggestions on the article talk pageI have yet to incorporate. I will have time to now and was hoping to get some other suggestions, aside from those already given. Looking to bring this article up to GA status, it surely needs a copy edit. Critique welcomed, critique and editing very welcomed. A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 06:52, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article seems pretty decent. Here's a few comments that I hope are of some use:
The lead section seems to brief to me. It isn't [Wikipedia:Lead section|capable of standing alone as a concise overview of the article]], &c. A longer lead would also help with the images colliding with the infobox.
Is there a larger image for the infobox? The current image looks slightly degraded due to expansion.
In the description, the image of the female should be co-located with the paragraph describing the female.
The "Habitats" section is very brief. Is there any reason it couldn't be merged with the "Range" section? I.e. "Habitats and range"
A color-coded map of the range would be a good addition.
The images in the "Host plants" section are creating an irregular format for the surrounding text in my browser. Is there any reason why the images couldn't be moved to the appropriate descriptive section of the text?
Any reason that Taxonomy and Evolution can't be combined, as on the Albatross page?
The first units on the page are in metric; the remainder are old English. Personally I favor using all metric on scientific articles with old English in parentheses. But it would be good, at least, to use consistent units.
It could use one or two more images of the Butterfly. There are currently more plant pictures on the page.
Oh excellent, thank you. I will address each comment with a few specific comments after I get a chance to incorporate them. IvoShandor05:01, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
