Wikipedia:Peer review/Missingno./archive1
This article is an amazing example of the well explained and detailed stuff you get on Wikipedia that you wouldn't find elsewhere. It's not my article in any way, but I think it deserves to head towards featured status as an example of the interesting things you can find on Wikipedia. Please check it out and see how it could be made more accessable to a broader audience, or have more information from the talk page included within the main article. --Pengo 02:02, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
- The first step on the road to featured status will be adding references to the article, and preferably inline citations. Also, it would be nice to turn the seemingly unconnected bullet points in the first section into some sort of prose. Christopher Parham (talk) 04:14, 2005 July 27 (UTC)
- You're right about it being an interesting article. However, I was disappointed to see that after I had read heaps of information, up popped a table of contents. Headings need to be added in earlier (perhaps: "History", "Origins of the glitch", etc.) and a well-defined lead will need to go before the TOC, explaining what the glitch is and in which Pokemon games it appears. Harro5 09:40, July 28, 2005 (UTC)
- I could say why it appeares when something like that happenes. otherwise I wrote it in the 'M section in discusion, The one about the slot fillers.-darkmewham
- You're right about it being an interesting article. However, I was disappointed to see that after I had read heaps of information, up popped a table of contents. Headings need to be added in earlier (perhaps: "History", "Origins of the glitch", etc.) and a well-defined lead will need to go before the TOC, explaining what the glitch is and in which Pokemon games it appears. Harro5 09:40, July 28, 2005 (UTC)