Wikipedia:Peer review/Mel Carnahan/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I previously failed a GAN in part of sourcing issues, and apparently "minor prose issues". I have taken the first steps in addressing at least the sourcing issue, but if I'm being honest, I don't know if I'm doing this right. I'd love to get this to a Good Article, so at the very least, I'd appreciate some help in addressing the "minor prose issues" as the reviewer put it. If you could help check to see if I've done sourcing correctly too, I would greatly appreciate it, considering that was the bigger problem. But considering how many sources were used, I'd understand if you only helped with addressing the prose issues. Also, if this isn't under the right category, my sincerest apologies. Thank you in advance to any prospective reviewers.
All the best, FountofInterestingInfo (talk) 05:59, 19 October 2023 (UTC)