Wikipedia:Peer review/Mega Man X/archive1

Mega Man X

I've listed this article for peer review because I recently expanded it. I don't plan to nominate to GA but it was way too small some days ago and I decided to give a push similar to the Persona subseries article. Is there any notable issue that needs to be solved? I've tried to search for sales but Capcom tends to put only the individual ones rather than the series in general.

Thanks, Tintor2 (talk) 14:14, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Comments from Z1720

Comments after a quick skim:

• No concerns with citing in the prose.
• Many of the citations are missing key information like the author's name. I suggest that this is included.
• Refs 92, 93, and 94 need an accessed on date.
• Refs 2-8 have quotes, but this isn't required on Wikipedia anymore. I suggest that these be removed.
• Avoid the "X says Y" structure in the Reception section, particularly in the second and third paragraphs. WP:RECEPTION gives some advice on this.

Hope this helps! Z1720 (talk) 20:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)