Wikipedia:Peer review/Mandy Moore/archive1

Mandy Moore

Worked on this article for a while - fairly detailed/sourced/covers everything necessary at length. Already a GA, would appreciate comments on how to approach FA level Mad Jack 17:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Needs a longer lead per WP:LEAD, all the images should have fair use rationales and you should probably remove a large part of the lists at the end. --Peter Andersen 14:01, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Except, which lists do you mean? Mad Jack 15:39, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Discography and filmography. I would at least remove the list of singles - lists are generally not appreciated on WP:FAC. Also the Other work section should either be expanded or incorporated into one of the other sections. --Peter Andersen 17:47, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It has unnecessary date links. This can be fixed quickly: simply copy the entire contents of User:Bobblewik/monobook.js to your own monobook. Then follow the instructions in your monobook to clear the cache (i.e. press Ctrl-Shift-R in Firefox, or Ctrl-F5 in IE) before it will work. This will give you a 'Dates' tab in edit mode. Hope that helps. bobblewik 18:49, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done on "other work" and date-linking. I removed the "Other songs" section, but singer-actor FA's like Lindsay Lohan do have a filmography and discography. So I am not sure what the standard is. Mad Jack 19:07, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I guess thats a good point...--Peter Andersen 20:04, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

lol! Mad Jack 20:11, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program. They may or may not be accurate for the article in question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles). If the following suggestions are completely incorrect about the article, please drop a note on my talk page.

Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at WP:LEAD. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.

Per WP:WIAFA, Images should have concise captions.

Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a no-break space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 18 mm.

Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links.

There are a few occurrences of weasel words in this article- please observe WP:AWT. Certain phrases should specify exactly who supports, considers, believes, etc., such a view.

Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a.
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions (and the javascript checklist; see the last paragraph in the lead) for further ideas.
Thanks, Andy _t 22:27, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done! Any more takers? :) Mad Jack 16:53, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good work so far. There are still a couple of unnecessary links to decades. Search for '1970s' and '80s'. bobblewik 13:34, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks! Mad Jack 16:47, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed the last picture in the filmography section. It should have a longer caption. Also what does ** signify after the name of the last three singles? --Peter Andersen 20:10, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No clue as to what the * were. I removed them. The picture has an unclear history behind it, and I was probably going to remove it, and now I have (I moved it to discussion). Mad Jack 20:29, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]