Wikipedia:Peer review/List of universities in Saskatchewan/archive1
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for October 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because this article is too short to be featured, but I'd still like to receive feedback on how to improve it. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 16:47, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Beautifully done, might be expandable per my comments at Manitoba and Alberta. Very good formatting, illustration, layout, and citation. I'm thinking in terms of utility: if a reader were considering studying or working at one of these places, what would be the basic information they'd want to know? Plus a bit more on the First Nations University--it's an interesting part of the Canadian higher education system. DurovaCharge! 06:12, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, I've copyedited a bit and also added a bit more on the First Nations University. Gary King (talk) 06:46, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
"This Agreement allowed FNUC to become an independently administered university-college that served the academic, cultural, and spiritual needs of First Nations students." Sounds promotional."the statute outlines"-->these statutes outline.The previous clause refers to "statutes", so keep it consistent.Spell out lesser-known abbreviations in the citations.Dabomb87 (talk) 12:58, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- Ah yes, I should have caught the promotional material one. Gah. Anyways, all done. Gary King (talk) 16:52, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- Comments
- Spell out abbreviations in the references.
- Otherwise, sources look good.
–Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 13:22, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- All done Gary King (talk) 16:52, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
- Comment - same thing as others, expand lead and spell out key.SRX 20:56, 24 October 2008 (UTC)