This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because, as with the 1952 list, I want to check up the quality of prose and also to get some assistance with finding references.
Songs that entered the top 10 in 1992 but did not peak until 1993 are listed in a separate table and -> commas and WP:NUMBERS = Songs that entered the top ten in 1992, but did not peak until 1993, are listed in a separate table, and...
songs that peaked in 1991 but remained in the chart are listed in List of top 10 singles in 1991 (UK). -> songs that peaked in 1991, but remained in the chart are listed in the previous year chart.
I have changed your wording slightly and changed them in the article.
different singles reached their peak -> maybe "topped the chart".
"Reaching their peak" doesn't necessarily mean getting to the top of the charts.
four singles recorded in 1991 and one that did not peak until 1993 also charted in the top 10 during the year. -> commas = four singles recorded in 1991, and one that did not peak until 1993, also charted in the top 10 during the year.