Wikipedia:Peer review/List of ice hockey teams in Alberta/archive1
Appearance
A list I have been working on for some time, and would like to nominate as a featured list. My primary concern is how best to cite the references. I also would like to make sure the layout is easy to read and navigate. Thanks. Resolute 22:42, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Looking good.... This does need inline citations. For the sources you're using, I would recommend Template:Cite web. You can use the <ref> element to put the citations into a nicely-formatted list of footnotes -- see Wikipedia:Footnotes for details. Good luck! -- Visviva 15:10, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks! I've begun adding inline citations, starting with the major pro teams. The difficulty I am having is where best to put them for each team's history. i.e.: After each team name, or in the notes section? Resolute 17:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- The way you're doing it (in the notes section) seems fine to me; it's the specific historical fact that needs citation, rather than the team name itself. At least that's how I see it. -- Visviva 02:11, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks. Citations pretty much complete, and I added an image. Resolute 05:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- The way you're doing it (in the notes section) seems fine to me; it's the specific historical fact that needs citation, rather than the team name itself. At least that's how I see it. -- Visviva 02:11, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks! I've begun adding inline citations, starting with the major pro teams. The difficulty I am having is where best to put them for each team's history. i.e.: After each team name, or in the notes section? Resolute 17:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ t 21:35, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. About not linking headings, is this a requirement? It seems to me that it is important, and relevent, to link to the leagues that each team played in, but I am not sure of any other way of doing so that would not come off as "bulky" and redundant. Resolute 01:17, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- I think there are different schools of thought on this one. Regular articles don't generally need linked headings, but I'm fairly sure I've seen featured lists with linked headings. Of course, it's possible those were added after featuring. -- Visviva 02:11, 12 December 2006 (UTC)