Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Real Madrid C.F. managers/archive1
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because i think it's close to FL status, but needs some improvements.
Thanks, Hadrianos1990 talk 05:37, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- I think it has good chances to become FL. The expression "sack" seems too informal to me. Jan.Kamenicek (talk) 09:23, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Brianboulton comments: In general the list itself seems to be in much the same format and contain much the same information as other lists of football managers, and is very clearly presented. A few specific points arise:-
- As this is English Wikipedia, English equivalents should be given for a few terms (La Liga, Copa del Ray, Supercopa de Espaňa). This could best be done by way of a note.
- You list only two references. They do not seem to provide all the information shown in the tables. For example, only a few recent performance statistics seem to be available on these sites, so where has the historic information come from?
- Unlike other football management lists which have been featured, ther are virtually no in-line citations
- All references need to be properly formatted, providing minimally title, publisher and access date.
- Who is behind the Real Madrid portal site? How can we be confident that it is accurate?
- In the text, the phrase "as well as those who have been in permanent charge" is unnecessary, since this is clearly the main object of the list.