Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Local Nature Reserves in Greater London/archive1

List of Local Nature Reserves in Greater London

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I plan to nominate it for featured list and I would like feedback first, particularly on the descriptions, but any other areas which may not meet FL standard.

Thanks, Dudley Miles (talk) 20:06, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Tim riley

~~Just opened this page and will review the article soonest. Tim riley talk 17:46, 25 June 2014 (UTC)~~[reply]

I don't think I'm going to be much use to you at this peer review, for the very simple reason that I have the utmost difficulty finding anything to criticise or query: this article is a magnificent piece of work. Having had only a few encounters with FL candidates over the years, I've just refreshed my memory of the FL criteria, and this list seems to me to meet them all handsomely. I certainly don't think you need be concerned about your descriptions, which are pithy and to the point. In a desparate attempt to justify my presence on this page:

You repeat links such as oak whenever the term recurs. I believe it is indeed usual to do this in sortable lists, and isn't regarded as WP:OVERLINK, but I can't lay hands on the MoS authority for it.
You are inconsistent between St John's-wort at Coldfall Wood, with apostrophe and hyphen, and St Johns wort at The Manor, Havering, with neither.
St. John's Wood with a full stop or St John's Wood without one? The Saint's wort doesn't get one, and I don't think his Wood should either.

And that really is all I can find. Loud applause. – Tim riley talk 09:12, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your help. As so often, the sources conflict how they show names. Dudley Miles (talk) 16:58, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]