Wikipedia:Peer review/List of India ODI cricketers/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I have edited and updated this list up to 4 December 2011. It wasn't updated in last 3 years. I also want everyone to know that this list was featured list previously. But it lost that status due to lack of updates as this list changes every week. I hope at least some of you guys reply.
Thanks, Vyom25 (talk) 14:41, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
- Comments (quick ones)
- Don't start with "This is a list of... ", see some recently promoted sports FLs to see what I mean. Done
- Would be nice to have an image or two. Done
- Link the ICC. Done
- No need to relink and re-abbreviate ODI in the second para of the lead. Done
- "winning 62 Man of the Match awards most by any player" grammatically incorrect. Done
- Why is this list not up to date (the last Indian ODI was 8 December, this says updated 4 December 2011). Done
- See WP:DASH - the year ranges should use an en-dash, not a hyphen. Done
- Names normally sort by surname (using the {{sortname}} template) but perhaps that's not the case with Indian names...
- Checking the sorting (e.g. NO - 54 sorts between 6 and 5) on all numeric columns.
- Use consistent number of decimal places, e.g. 1.00 instead of 1 for Ojha's average. Done
- Captains section, seems like a list of trivia to me. Done
- Don't mix up refs and notes, e.g. Ref [21] is a note and not a ref. Done
- Check the references, there are template problems, missing accessdates, etc. Done
Overall, a way to go before you should submit at WP:FLC, happy to provide further advice once this lot is addressed. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:25, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- I have fixed some and doing the rest. Why Captains section look like list of trivia? please clarify.--Vyom25 (talk) 08:10, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- It's a list of nine bullet point "facts". The Rambling Man (talk) 08:27, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- I have reformatted it, have a look.--Vyom25 (talk) 09:32, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- Better, but the grammar needs a lot of work. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:35, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- Name sorting is done both way in case of Indian names so if it is better to sort by surname then I can do that. But problem is only with South Indian names such as Ravichandran Ashwin where surname is not mentioned Ashwin is name and Ravichandran is a patronymic.--Vyom25 (talk) 07:10, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- Well, as I said, I'm not an expert with regard to Indian names, so I'm probably not the best person to ask. Suggest you have a word at WT:CRIC. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:45, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ok done--Vyom25 (talk) 14:42, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- Well, as I said, I'm not an expert with regard to Indian names, so I'm probably not the best person to ask. Suggest you have a word at WT:CRIC. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:45, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
- Name sorting is done both way in case of Indian names so if it is better to sort by surname then I can do that. But problem is only with South Indian names such as Ravichandran Ashwin where surname is not mentioned Ashwin is name and Ravichandran is a patronymic.--Vyom25 (talk) 07:10, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- Better, but the grammar needs a lot of work. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:35, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- I have reformatted it, have a look.--Vyom25 (talk) 09:32, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- It's a list of nine bullet point "facts". The Rambling Man (talk) 08:27, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- I have fixed some and doing the rest. Why Captains section look like list of trivia? please clarify.--Vyom25 (talk) 08:10, 13 December 2011 (UTC)