Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Drexel University alumni/archive1
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for August 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I'm interested in taking this to WP:FL and would like some feedback. Some questions I have about the list; is the intro ok in length? Should redlinked alumni be included? Should they be unlinked? (I've seen FL's with both) Is information about the Drexel 100 presented in a way that's understandable? Any feedback would be great, thanks! --ImmortalGoddezz (t/c) 20:50, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
- Comments from Bencherlite (talk · contribs)
- The current feeling at WP:FL is that lists should not begin with "This is a list of...". Is there a more interesting way you can start?
- Also, you can now just write the introductory few sentences without feeling you need any words in bold: see this (a recent rewording: see here under "Lead section")
- A few sentences about some of the people in the list in the introduction wouldn't hurt
- Personally, I'd prefer photos alongside the appropriate section, rather than all at the start - it's easier to find the details of the person that way.
- "Reference" could be cut to "Ref" in each table
- The redlinks are a problem: if they're "notable" enough to be mentioned here, they really ought to have at least a stub about them.
- One likely question at WP:FL will be what steps you've taken to make the list "comprehensive" in terms of finding names to add - your answer?