I've listed this article for peer review because it was a monster to create and I would like others to check that it appears well crafted. I am especially interested in if the breaking down of former Broadway theaters into time periods is successful, how previous names for each theater are dealt with, if the repeated restating of the different time periods and definitions becomes monotonous, and overall spelling and grammar (as that is really not my strongsuit). I hope to propose this as a featured list after this peer review.
@Found5dollar this is a great article. I would encourage you to directly nominate it at WP:FL. It reads very well, and is very interesting; is well sourced and, addressing your concerns above, I think that division is very logical and very well explained, spelling and grammar is fine, and there is not that significant repetition. Any concerns can be addressed directly there. Cheers --Tom (LT) (talk) 09:29, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This review has been closed as suitable for a direct nomination. Your request has been reviewed and is considered suitable for direct nomination. No issues have been identified that couldn't be ironed out during the nomination process. Good luck!
