Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Bleach chapters/archive1
Appearance
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for December 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because it needs advices on possible grammar advices as well as the structure of the list.
Thanks, Tintor2 (talk) 21:06, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Comments from Collectonian (talk · contribs)
- The chapter and volume titles should use proper casing, rather than keeping all uppers or all lowers, per usual naming/style conventions
- Japanese words that are not common words should be italicized, such as katana, kanji, furigana, and tankōbon (and they should italicized in all instances)
- Mentioned on the talk page already, but for chapters with two names, use the volume name as it is how the list is organized; either note in a parenthetical or in footnotes that it had a different title when serialized (and I'm inclined to think that those should be sourced to the magazine issue it appeared in.
- It is something of a bone of contention at the moment, but I personally think the items listed under Chapters not yet in tankōbon format should be sourced to the specific issues of the magazine they appeared in. Otherwise, how do we know they are accurate? The individual chapters within a tankōbon are implicitly sourced to that volume, but individual chapters in serialization do not have that type of sourcing; sourcing all looks good otherwise
- That sure would be hard. Could it be explained in a more general way?Tintor2 (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- That's probably one reason its not currently done (and it probably isn't required for FL passing, since D.Gray-man doesn't have it). My thinking, though, is if the chapters have been serialized and we have the title, it should be possible to source that title to the issue of WSJ it appeared in using {{cite journal}} rather than just presuming all are correct. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 00:37, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- That sure would be hard. Could it be explained in a more general way?Tintor2 (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- Some copyediting is needed, as I spotted a few mild grammar issues in the lead and while quickly glancing at some early volume summaries; I didn't check all of them to avoid spoilers past the English releases :-)
- This will take longer. Anybody interested? What are the parts from the lead that need fix?Tintor2 (talk) 18:27, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- See List of Marmalade Boy chapters and List of D.Gray-man chapters (two newest chapter list FLs) to see how their leads are done for some possible additional tweaks (particularly the opening line). -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 21:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Done (I guess).Tintor2 (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Hope that helps some. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 21:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- "They have been published in the Japanese-language magazine Weekly Shōnen Jump from Shueisha since 2001." Perhaps change it to: "In Japan, they are published in Shueisha's Weekly Shōnen Jump magazine since 2001."
- "
However, he alsoHe encounters former Soul Reaper Sōsuke Aizen" - "The distributing company Viz Media has been serializing the individual chapters in Shonen Jump since November 2007 in the United States."
- "The individual chapters are collected by Shueisha in a series of tankōbon volumes, which also include a poem by the cover character."
- "The first volume was released on January 5, 2002
, with. The latest volume is the thirty-sixth,volume 36released on December 4, 2008." - "Viz released the first volume on June 1, 2004, and
volume 24the twenty-fourth on September 2, 2008." - "A hardcover "collector's edition" of
volume 1the first volume with a dust jacket was released on August 5, 2008."
Well, the list needs copy-editing, preferably from someone more competent than myself. Consider tagging the list with the copy-edit article-issue template. It might catch someone's attention. Otherwise, good work. -- Goodraise (talk) 20:45, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks ^_^.Tintor2 (talk) 23:10, 4 December 2008 (UTC)