Wikipedia:Peer review/Kitana (Mortal Kombat)/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
This article has had a lot of work done to it in the past few months or so and I feel as if it deserves to be a Good Article. But before I nominate it as one, I would like some input.
Thanks, Kokoro20 (talk) 14:59, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
The article looks good, but I still note few problems that could happen in the GA review.Tintor2 (talk) 00:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- The "In video games" section could be trimmed a bit considering how the first Mortal Kombat games only had story in the characters bio and the endings that contradicted the events from following games. For example, the section could start with her role in Mortal Kombat II, with the above information given to a separate section about the character's main traits.
- The In video games section have a large numbers of paragraphs unsourced.
- Some references require formatting to address author, url, date, publisher, etc.
- Well, I have now added some sources for the "In video games" section. I'm not really sure how to trim it though. Kokoro20 (talk) 15:54, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
- I'd recommend using Reptile (Mortal Kombat)#In video games as an example of in-universe details in a Mortal Kombat article. Such character has been playable ever since the first game, and it focuses only on the main events around him.Tintor2 (talk) 01:46, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
- It's only because Reptile is a side character who was never important to the story at all (not in the games, not in the other media). That's to the point of him having NO STORY WHATSOEVER at first, so the first paragraph of this section is just meaningless "cruft" - imagine if Kitana's section dealt with how to unlock her in some games, like if it really mattered for Wikipedia readers (I think GameFAQs is for stuff like this, and not Wikipedia). --194.145.185.229 (talk) 17:13, 12 January 2012 (UTC)