Wikipedia:Peer review/Kannur district/archive1
Appearance
We have made this article by collaborative editing. However , I want to get an independent assesment from othe Wikipedians about suggestions to improve the article. I would be grateful if other point out where this article needs improvement. Sumal(59.177.27.122 9 July 2005 02:53 (UTC))
- Just a few quick structural comments:
- The lead section is too short.
- There are no references, just three extlinks
- The Aralam Wildlife section needs work. (And looks like it comes from a tourist brochure.)
- Demography: where do these numbers come from? Also, giving them with such precision is pretty much useless, I bet they're not correct anymore (people are born and die every day...)
- Too many one-sentence paragraphs; these should be merged.
- Can we have a few more images? (PD or GFDL, if possible. Do you have any pictures you took yourselves?) What does the landscape look like? About four images in total would be fine for an article of this length.
- I'll try to read it more thoroughly next week. Lupo July 9, 2005 09:42 (UTC)
- First separate the district contents from the city contents.
- For the city, read: Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian cities
- For the district, read Wikipedia:Wikiproject Indian districts
This should set you going. =Nichalp «Talk»= 12:18, July 12, 2005 (UTC)