Wikipedia:Peer review/Jigglypuff/archive1

Jigglypuff

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I'm interested in getting this article to GA status. It is currently rated either C- or B-class by most WikiProjects, so at the very least I'd like to make it B-class on every WikiProject. The article currently has plenty of information (particularly on reception), and it'd be good to know if any of it needs more verification or whether any parts should be expanded/trimmed. It's also a fairly important Pokémon, so it'd be good to further improve the coverage of Pokémon on Wikipedia.

Thanks, Harry Blue5 (talk) 12:58, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It could use some fluffing of the lead, video games, and manga sections. I can't wait to see this be a GA. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 13:32, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I see you removed some needless info. from the "Design" section and moved some of it to the "In video games" section, so thanks for doing that. What kind of fluff were you thinking of? Harry Blue5 (talk) 13:37, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Just overall addition of information to help explain the character. The sections are kind of small, and I think they could be expanded. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 13:39, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - Fortunately, I think Bulbapedia has some good info on the manga, so I'll try and see if I can anything. At the very least, I should be able to expand on the Magical Pokémon Journey bit. Harry Blue5 (talk) 13:47, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      - I expanded the lead, and fix an "also" and a contraction. I am not sure whether this would be appropriate for the article. It helped Lucario, because it was the introduction of his character, but since Jigglypuff was already in the series, and it was just thought she "might" have been removed, this just confirmed that she was not removed. Thoughts? _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 13:55, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
        I say it should be added. It's valid history of his role in Brawl, after all, if not the most important thing in the world. Harry Blue5 (talk) 14:00, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think the appearances in the video game section could use some more inline citation. I'm unsure if reference 12 covers both paragraphs. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 00:52, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- *ding*! References added. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 01:14, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 05:50, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Its getting close to GA in my opinion.

References should use a common date format instead of switching between the two. Month, XX, Year looks nice.

References should use trans_title for non-english titles.

~~Reference 23, in japanese ---> in Japanese~~

~~Reference 36, use a cite book template without linking to that book.~~

I don't see a reference for the voice actors nor are they mentioned in the anime section of the article.

Same for pokemon live, no source

~~Printed adaptions "PS288", what does this mean?~~

Ref 18, is that from a book? It should have a book reference noted somewhere
- It's from an old Japanese magazine.
Reference 26, WP:CAPS, uncapitalize them

Not mandatory but you might want to archive some of the references in case they disappear one day. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 05:50, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed some things. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 13:40, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]