Wikipedia:Peer review/Indonesian architecture/archive1

Indonesian architecture

I'm looking for comments on all parts of the article. I know that the contemporary section is underdeveloped. Any ideas on that section - and other sections?

Thanks, Merbabu 08:25, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Briefly, at this point you don't need the expansion tag! The article is definitely a great length but what it lacks are sources. I'd recommend editors stop expanding and start finding sources for every claim and every fact throughout the article. Also, take a look at WP:LEAD to improve the introduction. Good luck! --Midnightdreary 13:42, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah - good point. I've gone off expansion tags since the time I put it there anyway. Almost everything (if not everything) actually came from the few sources there. But I have more at hand which can fill in the in-line cites. --Merbabu 13:50, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR _t 02:06, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You definitely could use more sources, if you can find any further books on this topic. The Javanese focus of Religious architecture should either be explained better (was this because of greater foreign influence on Java?), or it should be corrected through example styles from other regions (probably both would be appropriate). For expanding Contemporary architecture in particular, I suggest looking for feature articles in architecture magazines.--Pharos 02:55, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Try google books. They have many researches regarding this. --80.127.195.146 (talk) 10:55, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]