Wikipedia:Peer review/Impossible Princess/archive2
I have recently added to and expanded the article about this excellent, but largely ignored Kylie Minogue album. Any suggestions on how to improve the article would be wonderful, as hopefully it can one day be promoted to feature article status. Underneath-it-All 23:47, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
- Looks pretty good after a brief scan. A couple things:
- Rearrange the sections. Move ==Chart Performance to either before or after ==Critical Response== to juxtapose the differences and/or similarites between the two reactions. Move ==Track Listing== to either before or after ==Release Details==. Nonprose 'reference' type sections generally belong under the main text
- Overall, citations are good, but more inlines should be inserted into ==Singles==, with particular attention paid to chart performance and judgements about style. I've personally never heard of the album before, so I have no way to verify that "Some Kind of Bliss", the lead single from the album, became Minogue's least successful lead single release, where it reached number twenty-two on the UK Singles Chart and number twenty-seven in Australia." or "The second single "Did It Again" featured an aggressive vocal style, with alternative and Eastern musical influences"
- Without having read the article word for word, that's all I can come up with. Both should be easily fixable, and then this article will be well on its way - The Catfish 00:05, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the suggestions and I have moved the sections around, which has made the article look better overall. -- Underneath-it-All 01:47, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
- In what way can a Slovenian Kylie fan site (www.slokylie.com) be considered a reliable source for UK sales data? You'll need to cite a better source than that - Music Week, the BPI, a quality music paper, something like that. --kingboyk 06:02, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Found Minogue's Official BPI certifications and cited them instead of SloKylie. -- Underneath-it-All 18:07, 26 April 2006 (UTC)