Wikipedia:Peer review/Iazyges/archive2
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I'm working on getting it ready for FAC. I nominated it in January, but it was closed due to serious concerns about it not being ready for FA. I believe I have fixed all the problems mentioned there, and nearly doubled the article in size since then, but I would like some feedback on what could/should be improved before/if I nominate it again.
Thanks, Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 19:57, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Comments by Peacemaker67
[edit]Just a few things from me:
- The lead should be expanded to a summary of the article, needs major events to be mentioned at least
- Done
- did you use the same structure as another similar article that is a FA or similar? I just found that starting with Culture and Geography jarred a bit, given we later learn things about them in the History section.
- The culture section is much newer, previously only the history section existed. Someone had suggested I start out with the culture, to give an idea about the people.Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 08:56, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
- I think the various names bit of the lead would be better in a section rather than the lead (perhaps the first section), that would also mean you could dispense with citations in the lead, which should not usually be necessary as everything in the lead should be in the body
- Done
- Is there nothing known about them prior to their migration other than where they lived?
- I have found nothing even mentioning them at that point, unless to talk about their migration and the reasoning. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 08:56, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
- link Aorsi and Roxolani
- Done