Wikipedia:Peer review/Hurdy gurdy/archive2
Extensive work has gone into this page by many editors since it was last reviewed slightly over a year ago. Some of the work has gone to resolving points raised at that time by MyNameIsNotBob. While additional citation is needed (and in the works), any feedback on areas needing expansion or clarification for a non-expert audience (particularly by musicians not familiar with the instrument) would be appreciated. What would be needed to raise this to the level of a featured article, as proposed by malber a little over a year ago? --Fenevad 15:52, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Old peer review is here: Wikipedia:Peer_review/Hurdy_gurdy/archive1 --Fenevad 16:05, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
External Links - suggested removal
[edit]The following external links (see the Hurdy gurdy talk page for the list - Added Fenevad) violate the guidelines WP:EL and I'd recommend removing them. Keep in mind, Wikipedia is not a link repository +Nposs 18:33, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- I have removed the offending links and replaced one with a link to a non-mailing list reference instead. Thanks. +Fenevad 21:56, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Addition comments on talk page
[edit]Some additional comments have been posted on the article's talk page and addressed there. Thank you to everyone who responded. +Fenevad 13:55, 4 January 2007 (UTC)