Wikipedia:Peer review/Hugh Daily/archive1

Hugh Daily

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to get this article pushed up to GA status, and a couple of reviews would point out mistakes, wording issues, or reference problems.

Thanks, Neonblak (talk) 23:31, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR _t 01:27, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

It is very short, but I am sure you have exhausted your sources and cannot expand it. Please check http://books.google.com, http://www.nyt.com// and http://www.time.com archives. Your local library services may have access to research databases such as Thomson Gale Infotrac.
Not much to say - the references are formatted correctly, the prose looks good, the layout is good.
Can you find a picture to add?
Sorry I couldn't be more useful.

— Wackymacs (talk ~ edits) 17:48, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will check out those links, and the only existing picture that is known, is located in a book, to which I don't have a scanner. It can be used due to the fact it is the public domain as published photo prior to 1923. Thanks for the review, and I will try and expand when I find more information. Neonblak (talk) 18:10, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the fast response. Maybe a friend or your library has a scanner you can use? A picture will really improve the article. — Wackymacs (talk ~ edits) 18:31, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]