Wikipedia:Peer review/Homology modeling/archive1
I created this article, and am currently its sole contributor. While I'm not claiming it to be complete, someone who's outside my brain probably has a better perspective on what would best improve it. In particular, is it accessible/does it provide adequate context? Are the methods descriptions too vague? Is there enough/too much emphasis on structural genomics? Opabinia regalis 05:40, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ t 18:22, 19 November 2006 (UTC)