Wikipedia:Peer review/Harvard Film Archive/archive1
I'm interested in any comments anyone has to make. I'm planning on taking a photo for it, and I'd like to expand it, but somehow not simply pack it with trivia (schedules etc.) so I'd love some suggestions there. Thanks! Dina 16:58, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ t 22:59, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Here's a few comments that I had:
- The article is just very short with two of the three references being from Harvard Magazine. I would definitely suggest finding outside sources as you expand the article to prove its "notability".
- Definitely a photo of the archive to replace the stock photo of a film reel is a good idea.
- There are 27 years between the archive's first screening and today, we could use an update on it's history. Were there any notable grants given to the archive? Any controversy in its history?
- I would suggest combining many of the very short sections. E.g. Curators can go into the History. "The Collection" should probably be moved right up into the lead unless you're going to add substantial information on its films.
Good luck with the article!--Will.i.am 00:19, 1 December 2006 (UTC)