Wikipedia:Peer review/Great Commission Association/archive1
This article may need a check to see if there is undue weight given to very old criticisms (relative to content on current state of org.), and undue weight to minority POV. Some disputes on primary/secondary sources have also arisen. 3-4 main editors engaged in several month long gridlock/edit war with obvious POV on both sides. Bold editing would be appreciated to get everyone out of their foxholes. Nswinton 04:05, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 03:44, 7 May 2007 (UTC)