Wikipedia:Peer review/Ginga Legend Weed/archive1

Ginga Legend Weed

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I hope to eventually have it achieve GA status. I'm aware that it is in need of a copy-edit, and will sign it up for one in the near future. Also, a note about the plot length: I usually like to have them be shorter, encompassing major plot details while still getting the point across. However, this series is 60 volumes long, and the arcs are not terribly connected. As such, I've cut out much detail, but it still remains fairly long.

Thanks, WhiteArcticWolf (talk) 01:22, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Considering the series' length, I think that trimming it a little will be enough. Since Ginga Legend Riki is only one-volume long, its plot could be easily trimmed. I thought that maybe both Prequel and Sequel sections could be combined into a single section such as "Related works" or maybe "Legacy", but it depends on the sequel's length. Regarding reception, I think a GA reviewer would point there is only one critic commenting the series, but I can't find other reviews. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 16:49, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will trim both of the plots as much as I can and I agree that "Legacy" would be work as a section title. Reception is difficult because, despite the series' length and NA release, it received little coverage outside of Thompson's reviews. I've searched high and low, but there honestly is nothing I have found, even on Famitsu's site. Thank you. WhiteArcticWolf (talk) 23:31, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]