Wikipedia:Peer review/Ghost/archive1

Ghost

This article is in great need of help. What keeps it from being fully comprehensive and a Featured Article? Time to whip out that fine tooth comb. :) Judgesurreal777 03:02, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll return with the "fine tooth comb" sometime later, but first off it needs inline citations, probably WP:FOOTNOTEs. Thanks, AndyZ _t 23:51, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First paragraph of the "Beliefs" section immediately makes claims and assertions regarding ghosts. For those of us who do not give much credit to such phenomenon, this has the appearance of bias. I agree with AnyZ regarding the need for citations throughout, especially wherever it makes an assertion of some type, including reported hauntings. I think I'd also like to see an expansion on the topic of ghost researchers. Thanks. :-) — RJH 18:57, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]