Wikipedia:Peer review/German Eastern Marches Society/archive1
The article's been a target of various nats from all over the world in the past. As the topic is quite controversial, revert wars and POVs from all sides were quite abundant. As I often do I decided to escape forward and expanded the article significantly, adding plenty of sources. This proved a right tactics as it seems that the article's been fairly stable since May.
Now then, during the GA nomination, one of the judges noted that the article ends abruptly, a remark I did not understand. Perhaps there are also other problems that need to be addressed, I'm not really sure what's more to add. Could someone take a look at the article and tell me what's missing? //Halibutt 09:31, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ t 14:43, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- Very finely done. I have only minor concerns like footnotes should go after punctuation marks. I'm not suprised edit wars stopped, this looks like a neutral article which just retells history without pushing anything. Ofcourse, since I'm not familiar with the subject, I'm not one to say if this article is neutral or not. Another concern, is the sometime awkward sentence starters like "Interestingly" and multiple use of the word "also" which might prompt very minor redundancy cleaning. It also be nice if the red links could be taken care. Anyway, great work. I hope to see it at FAC soon. - Tutmosis 22:16, 10 November 2006 (UTC)