Wikipedia:Peer review/Ganon/archive1
Planning on elevating to featured article status, so I need some advice on what to add, delete or change. - A Link to the Past (talk) 00:14, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
- Needs references. Needs to approach the subject matter from a different angle, I think. The game-by-game breakdown is not the best approach for fictional-character articles; compare how Bugs Bunny looks now to how it was a year earlier, and you'll see what I mean. Also refer to Lakitu for an article that gives an overview of a character without dwelling too much on a play-by-play of all the character's game appearances. But you knew that already, Link. Why the mass peer reviews for articles that are clearly not near-FA quality? BrianSmithson 19:02, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
- You know that when I started working on Lakitu, Katamari Damacy, Henry Fonda and Wario, none of them were close to FA quality? - A Link to the Past (talk) 20:58, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
- I didn't say that you couldn't get an article to FA quality (though you should be careful about taking too much credit for any of the pages you mentioned; they all have had many editors). But according to the peer review rules, an article is supposed to be near FA quality to be listed on this page. BrianSmithson 23:17, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
- You know that when I started working on Lakitu, Katamari Damacy, Henry Fonda and Wario, none of them were close to FA quality? - A Link to the Past (talk) 20:58, 23 September 2005 (UTC)