I've listed this article for peer review because I am not sure whether to nominate this for GA or FA. It would be helpful to see what others think needs expanding/shortening or fixing in the article.
A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APRt12:48, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
