Wikipedia:Peer review/Fir0002/new page/archive1
Appearance
I would like to place my userpage (admittidly not an article) on Peer Review so that it all its bugs can be removed. I would like to see if people think loading times are OK, if the design is OK or if it would put people off editing my userpage, and if it looks good.
Thanks for your time! --Fir0002 21:25, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
- Good work on the page! The layout of it is nice and I had no problem with it loading. I have a high speed internet connection and the page loaded very quickly. Underneath-it-All 00:47, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Sweet! I like the layout, and like Underneath-it-All my high speed connection got the page up in no time. One thing that did sorta bug me: the page was a little wider than my moniter setting, but I am not going to complain about it. TomStar81 06:08, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
- Loading time was fine, as was the left-most 2/3 of the page. The other third falls off the edge of my screen. ;) Markyour words 12:52, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- What kind of screen res are you on? I've got a 17" LCD so the screen res is up at 1280x1024, but I find that if you have only 1024x768 and you scroll right (you'll have to cut out the wiki LHS side bar) it fits just perfect. Anyway thanks for everyone's comments, I think I'll be bold and override my old one! --Fir0002 20:57, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
- I'm on 1024x768. I can see it if I scroll across, but I don't scroll as a matter of principle. Markyour words 14:36, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
- My moniter is also set for 1024x768. TomStar81 03:58, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- I'm on 1024x768. I can see it if I scroll across, but I don't scroll as a matter of principle. Markyour words 14:36, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
- What kind of screen res are you on? I've got a 17" LCD so the screen res is up at 1280x1024, but I find that if you have only 1024x768 and you scroll right (you'll have to cut out the wiki LHS side bar) it fits just perfect. Anyway thanks for everyone's comments, I think I'll be bold and override my old one! --Fir0002 20:57, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
eeek! Looks bad on 800x600. =Nichalp «Talk»= 12:30, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
- Doesn't everything? ;-) — RJH 18:35, 10 February 2006 (UTC)