Wikipedia:Peer review/Evanescence/archive1
This is an article about alternative rock band Evanescence. The Evanescence WikiProject hopes to nominate this article as a Good Article Candidate some time in the future.
Main points
Is it easy to understand for non-fans? Is it possible for this article to be a GA or FA? If not, what does the article need to improve and get to GA or FA? Wich sections need more attetion? Armando.O (talk|contribs) 02:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, APR t 23:04, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Ideogram
[edit]I found this article generally informative and well written. It could always be better, of course, and I have tagged a couple of awkward sentences near the beginning.
I think it has a good chance to pass GA, if you can fix those citation needed tags.
For FA, I personally think the prose is not good enough, but then my standards here are higher than most reviewers.
I'm not really sure you should stick all those subcategories under "History". It seems to me you really want to structure the article around the album releases, with a separate section for the Christian controversy. --Ideogram 09:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- About the Christian controversy: It's placed there because it's a recurring problem since the Evanecence early history until today. Armando.O (talk|contribs) 19:37, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- But it's placed last in the History section, implying that it happend at a particular point in history, namely last. --Ideogram 20:59, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Pictures
[edit]is there a better picture that we can use for the Evanescence article? one where you can clearly see them closer.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Zacanescence (talk • contribs) 04:49, February 18, 2007(UTC)
- This is a review, not a page of requests. You should check that on the archives of the Evanescence last page (I think it's the last archive). Armando.O (talk|contribs) 00:51, 22 February 2007 (UTC)