Wikipedia:Peer review/Euchre/archive1
Many editors have contributed to this article and I think it is somewhat well written and a good article. I'd like to incorporate others' ideas and improvements. I notice that the scoring table is a little strange, so maybe someone can fix that too. Thanks for your time. Ryanminier 14:02, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- Several quick points:
- the strategy section should be fleshed out, and the list of "commandments" removed, or at the very least restated in a more formal fashion
- the dealing section should be compressed somewhat - it seems too long for what should be a reasonably easy thing to explain. (Also, I don't think that dealing cards one by one is uncommon)
- an image showing and describing how the scoring is done would be useful
- I'm not sure if everything labelled as being a Midwest rule or style is actually just done in the Midwest. For example, "first black jack deals" is done in Ontario too.
- we need to check facts for the Guernsey variation.
- I've just perused the article quickly, so I'm sure I've missed a number of things. Mindmatrix 15:39, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ t 23:40, 16 August 2006 (UTC)