Wikipedia:Peer review/Eris (dwarf planet)/archive1

This article seems pretty good to me; just wondering what you think it needs to move up to Feature status. Serendipodous 20:32, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It looks pretty good so far. I'd suggest merging some of the one or two-paragraph sections, unless they can be expanded. That would also serve to shorten the table of contents. The Atmosphere and Surface sections needs a citation or two. Some of the notes consist only of a link: I'd use cite templates so that those are properly configured. The External links section seems very long: can any of those be merged in as references? Thanks. — RJH (talk) 18:32, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK; I've addressed a lot of your issues, though there still are a few refs I need to place. Serendipodous 13:54, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sizes of various TNOs including Eris were measured by Spitzer Space Telescope. See [1]. This is the third independent determination of its size and I think it needs to be mentioned in the article. In all other respects the article is good and should be nominated for FA status. Ruslik 12:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Frustratingly, that article doesn't actually give a diameter estimate for Eris, so I probably shouldn't include it. It did make a number of interesting claims about its albedo, however. Serendipodous 13:39, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - Estimate is in Table 4. Ruslik 06:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]