Wikipedia:Peer review/Dynamoterror/archive1

Dynamoterror

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because it was recently updated and I strongly believe that this is worthy of a C or B class with the newfound wealth of information it now contains surrounding this taxon and its history.

Thanks, Sauriazoicillus (talk) 13:26, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll have a look soonish. Note that it's probably easier to get views by palaeo editors at the specialised WP:PaleoPR. FunkMonk (talk) 08:27, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ignoring the cladogram, there are some WP:duplinks, which can be highlighted with this script:[1]
Show images of the other known limb elements? FunkMonk (talk) 08:56, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Show the frontal comparison image in the white space under classification? FunkMonk (talk) 08:56, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps a life restoration and a size comparison could be requested at WP:Dinoart?
According to this[2] blog post, there is apparently an additional specimen that was mentioned in an abstract.
Seen this, Sauriazoicillus? FunkMonk (talk) 06:57, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be on it as soon as I can. However, I'll need help with the reconstruction and a size comparison. 12:31, 17 March 2022 (UTC)