Wikipedia:Peer review/Dromedary/archive2

Dromedary

Previous peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I think this is well-developed to become a FA. I hope this peer review would take my attention to overlooked problems or obstacles for the article's FAC.

Thanks, Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 09:00, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

• Please read the bold red instruction in the "Nomination procedure" box at the top of the PR page. Yomangani^talk 23:42, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

I am sorry, I really did not know about this. What do I ought to do now? --Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 12:08, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Either close this one (follow the instructions on how to archive at the top of the PR page) and concentrate on the giant eland or vice versa. Yomangani^talk 12:51, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

The giant eland review is now archived, so this peer review can be started. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 12:11, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

You mention that they have oval shaped blood cells but don't mention their function. The TV show Inside Nature's Giants discusses this. Also I think you should mention the turbinates which keeps the brain cool. LittleJerry (talk) 01:45, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your suggestions. Will have to look about anatomy to find more. Well, I can not use the information from this TV show unless it can be cited, and I haven't ever heard of it.Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 13:26, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Okay fine. Got access to the TV show website, using the info. Thanks! Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 10:37, 15 October 2012 (UTC)