Wikipedia:Peer review/Downtown Cleveland/archive1

Downtown Cleveland

I already think this is an amazing article. Is it good enough to be FA? Lorty 15:10, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The table of contents seems longer than it really needs to be. I think a lot of the 'district' sections could be combined into a single section instead of having a separate section for every paragraph. The article also appears to be light on inline citations which would be a problem come FAC time.--Dekkanar 16:09, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ _t 01:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]