Wikipedia:Peer review/Daniel E. Friedmann/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I think the issues pertaining to it's validity have been addressed. Most importantly, citations were included for the content.
Thanks, Jeronimo Jeronimojammies (talk) 03:36, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
- This article has multiple still-valid issue tags, still leads like a promotional article on a barely relevant LP, and isn't long enough or well-written enough to really justify a full peer review. My immediate recommendation would be to scrap what's there and rewrite it in more encyclopedic tone from scratch. ResMar 15:13, 21 June 2014 (UTC)