Wikipedia:Peer review/Daft Punk/archive1

Daft Punk

This article has evolved a lot in the past year. Several of the contributors to the article have provided good info about the band for the past few months. I just wanted to know if there's anything that needs to be fixed or tweaked or even added into the article. Perhaps areas where a more in depth description can be made. Douglasr007 07:40, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, this is right next to the other article I'm commenting on. Here goes...

Improve the lead section; it should be able to stand on its own. See Wikipedia:Lead section and next comment.
Try to put the article in context. Could the style of the music be described in more detail? What is their place within their genre / related genres, or the music scene in general? (What will they be remembered for, historically?) What about musicians they were influenced by / have influenced? I would think entire new sections could be created discussing these.
Please, please, please no trivia sections. See Wikipedia:Trivia and Wikipedia:WikiProject Music/MUSTARD as guidelines continue to develop. Work relevant information into the context of other sections.
So you've bought into the "band logo in infobox" trend? In the long run, I'm fairly certain there is going to be backlash against this. Just a heads-up. –Unint 23:16, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please elabourate on this "backlash". To me it seems like the lead infobox is the perfect place for a logo. —(chubbstar)^{— talk | contrib | 00:30, 7 September 2006 (UTC)}[reply]

Ok, I changed the infobox for the band info but I have no idea what to do with the Trivia section. Could a section of cultural references be made for some of the trivia? I know I could delete some of the trivia bits since it's just refers to one of the artists and not the group itself. Douglasr007 09:09, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you could expand the article to discuss some of the things I suggested, I think you would be able to find natural places for the more important information among the trivia. I would seriously place that as the greater priority. –Unint 03:27, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ _t 15:38, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]