Wikipedia:Peer review/Critical responses to David Irving/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because…
This article did not have a discussion page and WP Banners. Would like to know if I have added the correct banners and receive feedback from possible improvements or corrections of my own edits. Like to receive input on Rating the WP Banners and their importance where required.
Thanks, Adamdaley (talk) 07:09, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Adamdaley, I'm somewhat unclear about your reason for requesting peer review. As stated on the instruction page, peer review is generally for mature, high-quality articles that are being prepared for the featured article process. If you are just looking for general feedback, you should use the article talk page. Anyone can assess an article up through B-class; you don't need to request a peer review to assess the article. --Andy Walsh (talk) 05:19, 21 December 2010 (UTC)