Wikipedia:Peer review/Co-counselling/archive1

Please suggest any ways in which this page can be improved to the highest standard.John Talbut 20:21, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Given that this seems to be a controversial article, it could use quite a few more citations. The standard for GA class tends to be about one citation per paragraph, but obviously articles need more or less depending on their details. You should cite any statement that refers to a fact the reader might want to check, and any statement that expresses an opinion or refers to the opinions of others. I have added a few "citation needed" tags to help start the process of adding more.

It seems to be that the article will be incomplete unless it discusses independent opinions (from outside RC or CCI) on this technique. Have any professional psychotherapists or psychologists written about/assessed this approach to therapy? Have any criticisms been made of it? MLilburne 18:15, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, footnotes should generally be placed at the end of a sentence rather than in the middle, as many of the footnotes in the article are. MLilburne 18:21, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ _t 00:52, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for these suggestions. I am (and I hope some others will be) working on it.John Talbut 07:30, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]