Wikipedia:Peer review/Civil Rights Movement in Omaha, Nebraska/archive1
Curious about the neutrality and tone of this article, and how far it is from being able to be nominated for feature article. - Freechild 20:48, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I actually read this article recently, independently from peer review, and found it very informative which is a good sign.
- It needs a lead for a start Freechild, see WP:LEAD.
- Bit nervous about the amount of crossover material that also appears in Racial Tension in Omaha, Nebraska, see WP:FORK and consider whether it applies.
Done - The floating quote that heads 1912-1962 needs to be incorporated into the body of the text, it also needs to be clearly attributed. At present it looks like its a floating title. Done
- For reference formats, see a recent FA article such as Puerto Ricans in World War II, which has access dates for web citations and so on. Try and format your refs as closely to those as possible.
- Make sure you read Wikipedia:Featured article criteria, including the advice from individual users at the foot of the article, making any changes that may apply.
- Do all of the above. Then give me a shout on my talk page and I'll see if I can help you make the article a featured article candidate.-- Zleitzen(talk) 02:20, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, Ruhrfisch 03:05, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
