Wikipedia:Peer review/Cerro Maravilla Incident/archive1
I'm nominating this article to find independent review and evaluation. I've reworked it twice, providing more and more references each time. However, this article is subject to various debates due to the sensitivity of the issues. Please help by offering suggestions... Thanks!! - Mtmelendez 21:49, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
- Looks very good. Some points:
- The lead should be expanded somewhat per WP:LEAD -- briefly summarize the investigations, the aftermath, and the legacy.
- Toward the end of "The second investigations": "New evidence would turn up against the police officers responsible for the killings,..." Like what?
- "Undercover agent acquitted, murdered" reads like a newspaper headline, but maybe that's fine.
- After expanding the lead, I would consider WP:GAC. -- bcasterline • talk 17:39, 6 September 2006 (UTC)