Wikipedia:Peer review/Cerebrospinal fluid/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I hope to get this up to GA. However, it's accumulated a lot of information over its lifespan and I'm not sure if all of it is relevant. I'm also not sure whether this article is accessible to lay readers. So I invite any and all to comment/edit the article, particularly with regard to: broadness, readability, accuracy, and reliability.
I can't respond to comments in a reasonable time-span but rest assured they will be addressed... eventually!
Thanks, LT910001 (talk) 08:19, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
- At a glance, this article seems to be based to a large extent upon this link, which is dead. As for specific comments, I don't know that anything specific could be given beyond structural pointers at this stage, particularly given the presence of the dead link (which might be easily solved, but then again, might not). What I think this article needs is a content expert with a better grasp of the subject who can give pointers on the way article needs to be organized and on which sections need expansion. ResMar 20:33, 20 June 2014 (UTC)