Wikipedia:Peer review/Caterpillar/archive1
I just read this article and thought it was great, so I created this page so that maybe it can begin the process of turning into a featured article. I haven't had anything to do with writing it myself though. --spiralhighway 22:52, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
- Needs a longer intro - should summarize the whole article, not just define the term.
- Much more substantial sourcing
- Needs sections on the taxonomy of caterpillars, the metamorphosis process and life cycle, the caterpillar in culture and fiction.
- The taxonomy goes with the Lepidoptera as a whole. This is just the larval stage. Satyrium 23:58, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
- The anatomy section could do with a diagram of the interior of a caterpillar.--Pyroclastic 04:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- The etymology of the word 'caterpillar' could be included near the beginning of the article.
- There are a number of pictures of unidentified caterpillars - for an encyclopedia article, it would help to identify them or to use other pictures of identified caterpillars --Jazriel 10:09, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
- The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program. They may or may not be accurate for the article in question (due to possible javascript errors/uniqueness of articles). If the following suggestions are completely incorrect about the article, please drop a note on my talk page.
- Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at WP:LEAD. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.
- There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City. (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
- This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 2(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.
- This article can use copyediting to ensure that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work.
- You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions (and the javascript checklist; see the last paragraph in the lead) for further ideas.
- Thanks, Andy t 22:30, 12 June 2006 (UTC)