Wikipedia:Peer review/Carrie Underwood/archive1
I'm not the original author but I'd like to know what needs to be done to make this a good article. Did I do the image fair use rationales right? User:Arual 14:44, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- Please see automated peer review suggestions here. Thanks, AZ t 00:36, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
- Just some random thoughts as they occur:
- Not clear from the article what 'Nielson Soundscan' is. I get it from one of the refs, but I suggest either dropping the mention of it (Is it important, does it add to the article?) or expanding just a tad to give a hint of what it is. As it is it sort of sidetracked me while reading.
- You'll need to work on the citation of references and possibly the references themselves. Currently it's not clear where the information in the article comes from, some of it comes from the inline citations, some of it seems not to - for example the 'graduating magna cum laude' doesn't seem to appear in any of the notes. It may be in the single listed reference of course, but I can't check that.
- The 'personal interests' section tails off into a list of facts rather than prose.
- Overall it's a very positive article. I know nothing about the subject, but I do wonder whether the article is really Neutral Point of View. You may want to check for that. Is her work universally acclaimed, or have there been any negative critical reactions? If there have, those need to be worked in as well.
- Go through the automated suggestions as well. They're helpful.
Good luck 4u1e 20:47, 23 July 2006 (UTC)