Wikipedia:Peer review/Care Bears/archive2

Care Bears

See also: March 2006 peer review

After over two months, the concerns surrounding the quality and layout of this article about my favourite cartoon of all time have finally been addressed. There are no lists, no informal talk, and no original research anymore; the content is as NPOV and multi-dimensional as possible; footnotes have been converted per Cite.php; and I have shown vandals no mercy when it comes to editing this page.

Finally, I am now resubmitting it after way too many a personal delay (for the past one to two weeks!).

Unfortunately, it's all been a one-man show for the most part, and I want to know how much better this page can get. More Wikipedia users should participate so that it will finally get the star it humbly deserves. Please tell me how far I've succeeded. (It's important it gets the featured treatment before this year's over; 2006 marks the 25th anniversary of the toy line.)

And I say once more (from last time):

Cheer Bear, kiss me--and kiss me good--when this finally succeeds as a featured article! When it does so, the Kingdom of Caring--and of God--will rejoice! --Slgrandson 16:16, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've just quickly skimmed over the article for now, but I noticed quite a few one sentence paragraphs. These should be combined with other paragraphs if possible and, when they constitute an entire sub-section, be expanded if possible. Cheers, --darkliight^[πalk] 06:57, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 2(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.

There are a few sections that are too short and that should be either expanded or merged.

Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at WP:GTL.

Please alphabetize the categories and interlanguage links.

Generally, trivia sections are looked down upon; please either remove the trivia section or incorporate any important facts into the rest of the article.
Thanks, AndyZ _t 13:00, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]